St. Louis County, Missouri
County collaborates across communities to solve flooding issues
Two different approaches to flood mitigation planning in St. Louis County, Missouri demonstrate the value of collaboration between communities to support long-term mitigation efforts that benefit everyone, while also showing the negative impact of loose regulations that allow new developments in the flood plain.
Photo by Louis Sohn - FEMA
The Meramec River is one of the longest free-flowing waterways in Missouri. There is a constant risk of flooding, which has caused millions of dollars in damage to many small towns. Communities along the river have taken various approaches to mitigating these risks, with very different results.
The two projects outlined below demonstrate that when communities work together to craft long-term flood mitigation solutions this can benefit a much bigger population, but when they work in isolation what helps one city may hurt another. Community leaders throughout St. Louis County have been working together for three decades to create The Meramec River Greenway, a program to acquire land along 108 miles of the river and conserve it as parks and wetlands.
As of 2013, the organization had preserved roughly 9,000 acres of flood plain. FEMA estimates that the buyouts and conservation of land prevent an average of $7.7 million in flood damage annually, while the project also provides parks and recreational areas that benefit citizens throughout the county.
In 2007 the town of Valley Park built a $49 million, 3.2-mile 100-year levee to protect its 7,000 citizens from floods. The project, which was paid for jointly by the Army Corps of Engineers and the community, eliminated the need for flood insurance in Valley Park, improved home values, and prevented flooding during events in 2008 and 2016. The levee protected Valley Park's residents, but some argued that it worsened flooding issues in communities downstream.
Benefits of mitigation
Lack of regulation of development in the flood plain has had significant consequences for one community
One issue is unregulated development in the flood plain, says David Wilson, senior manager of environment and community planning at EastWest Gateway Council of Governments, the metropolitan planning organization for the St. Louis region. He notes that in 2010 two buildings were constructed at a narrow point in the river, creating a dam that pushed water back into the town of Fenton. According to Wilson, there were no regulatory barriers to construction of the buildings in that location, despite the risks.
“We have had terrific successes in acquiring land and easements, but all it takes is one private owner or city leader willing to give permits for construction in the flood plain to do significant damage to the overall effort”
“The lesson," says David Wilson, "is that when city leaders collaborate to create long-term flood mitigation programs that meet the needs of the broader community, the financial, social and economic benefits can be substantial”
The lessons in St. Louis County are twofold: communities should cooperate in order to develop successful long-term flood mitigation actions; and regulations should restrict building in the flood plain. While local communities have benefited from substantial flood mitigation efforts, there are concerns that the lack of cooperation has led to mixed results in some areas.
For example, a report released in September 2016 indicates that the Valley Park levee may have been built too high, exacerbating flooding in downstream communities including Fenton.
Flood-prone neighborhood is converted into a park
Riverine flooding, Flash flooding